Science in Society Archive

Important Books & Reports

Banishing Glyphosate

Banishing Glyphosate - Dr. Eva Sirinathsinghji, Dr. Mae-Wan Ho and others

Glyphosate/Roundup, falsely claimed by Monsanto to be safe and harmless, has become the world’s most widely and pervasively used herbicide; it has brought rising tides of birth defects, cancers, fatal kidney disease, sterility, and dozens of other illnesses - more

Ban GMOs Now

Ban GMOs Now - Dr. Mae-Wan Ho and Dr. Eva Sirinathsinghji

Health & environmental hazards especially in the light of the new genetics - more

Living Rainbow H2O

Living Rainbow H2O - Dr. Mae-Wan Ho

A unique synthesis of the latest findings in the quantum physics and chemistry of water that tells you why water is the “means, medium, and message of life” - more

The Rainbow and the Worm - the Physics of Organisms

The Rainbow and the Worm - the Physics of Organisms - Dr. Mae-Wan Ho

“Probably the Most Important Book for the Coming Scientific Revolution” - more

Liberating Science and Imagination

Science co-opted by big business endangers society and stultifies the imagination on which the advancement of science depends; liberating science and the imagination is top priority for the survival of people and planet Dr. Mae-Wan Ho

Liberating Science

Science is central to every aspect of our everyday lives and our wellbeing, be it to do with climate change, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), nuclear energy, mobile telephony, or the tens of thousands of chemicals to which we are constantly exposed in our homes, workplace, and the general environment.

Science is also a force for innovation, and investing in science is indeed investing in wealth creation and the future.

Science, as much as the arts and humanities, needs to be thoroughly integrated into the social, cultural and political fabric of society; science-literacy is essential if we are to have a truly democratic society in which everyone can participate in making important decisions on science and science policies.

Integrating science in society and promoting public understanding is all the more important as science has been co-opted by big business more intent on profit than serving the public good or telling the truth about safety and sustainability. In my book Genetic Engineering Dream or Nightmare [1] (first published in 1998, translated into many languages, and reprinted with an introduction and update in 2007), I argued how bad science - in the form of outmoded and discredited genetic determinism - has colluded with big business unwittingly or otherwise to bring us the ‘brave new world’ of GMOs and animal and human cloning.

It has become increasingly difficult for people to get reliable and critical scientific information for deciding not only which technologies to adopt, but more importantly, which scientific research to support on the basis of social, ethical, environmental and aesthetic merit. There is a widespread and mistaken assumption that science is neutral or ‘value-free’ and hence beyond reproach, so it is only the technology arising from the science that can be good or bad.

Science, as opposed to religious dogma, is not about certainties; it is changing all the time. But, as in any other field of human endeavour, the status quo tends to hang on for far too long, because of vested interests in huge profits, top jobs, big research grants, and personal prestige and reputation. It is incredibly hard for new findings and new ideas to get a hearing in the wider scientific community, or for old, discredited theories like neo-Darwinism and reductionist, mechanistic biology in general to die. And all the more so when the old guard are backed by big corporations that have taken over every sector of society including our most sacred and revered academic institutions [2] The Corporate Take Over of Science (ISIS News 7/8).

Corporate interests have so thoroughly infiltrated our academic institutions that scientists are no longer free to work for the public good or tell the truth, or do anything new and exciting. Honest scientists who insist on doing so are persecuted and victimised, and by their own academic institutions that should be protecting and defending them.

Science that is not free stultifies the imagination on which the advancement of science depends. We need good, independent, and creative science to help exit the global financial crisis, not to mention the food crisis, health crisis, and climate change. Liberating science is top priority for the survival of people and planet.


The Institute of Science in Society (ISIS) was founded in 1999 to provide critical yet accessible scientific information to the public and policy makers, to reclaim science for the public good, and to promote accountability and sustainability in science and science policies. My husband Peter Saunders and I, both academic scientists, felt that science was too important to be left just to popularisers, philosophers, or social scientists lacking a thorough grounding in science. In particular, the reductionist paradigm derived from classical physics has outlived its usefulness and doing great harm to people and planet. We felt it was high time to go beyond to an organic, holistic perspective consonant with quantum physics that can enable us to live sustainably with nature; specifically by integrating our human economy into the circular economy (or thermodynamics) of nature (see [3] The Rainbow and the Worm, The Physics of Organisms, ISIS publication, and [4] Living, Green and Circular, SiS 53). Our main focus is science, how to save science, - for the love of science is what made us scientists in the first place - and how to make science work for society, for people and planet.

ISIS produces lively reports posted on its popular website, archived by the British Library since 2009 as part of UK’s national documentary heritage. The reports are circulated to a large e-mail list that includes all sectors of civil society worldwide, from small farmers in India to policy-makers in the United Nations. We publish an attractively illustrated, trend-setting quarterly art/science magazine Science in Society, and topical in-depth, influential, and timely reports as well as monographs.

ISIS also initiates major campaigns from time to time, including a global ban on GMOs and shift to sustainable, fossil-fuel-free, non-GM agriculture, and a truly green economy. These are launched with comprehensive reports: The Case for A GM-Free Sustainable World [5] in 2003, Which Energy? [6] in 2006, Food Futures Now *Organic*Sustainable *Fossil Fuel Free  [7] in 2008,  followed by [8] Green Energies - 100% Renewable by 2050 in 2009.

Our latest campaign to Reclaim Beauty and Truth in Science and Art, Quantum Jazz Biology, Medicine, and Art [9], was launched in a unique art/science event 26-27 March 2011. A wholefoods factory was transformed overnight into an art gallery and music/lecture hall around the theme of ‘quantum jazz’, the sublime aesthetic of quantum coherence in living systems and the living universe. For our next act, we are presenting Colours of Water, a festival inspired by water 12-28 March 2013 at the Menier Gallery in London (further details on: There will be exhibitions, conferences, workshops and multimedia performances by an amazing international cast of artists, scientists, musicians, and other social leaders, all convinced that the science and art of water hold the key to a social transformation towards the organic paradigm. Come and make the revolution happen; you are all invited.

Liberating Imagination

Liberating science is obviously very important; but more so, liberating the imagination, which is why we take art and science together so seriously. Scientists, especially the greatest scientists are motivated by the beauty of the natural order of things. So intensely felt is the love for the beauty of a scientific theory that some scientists don’t seem to care whether the theory happens to be true. Fortunately, really beautiful theories tend to be true, in the sense that their predictions can be tested and confirmed empirically. Indian-born American astrophysicist Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar (1910-1995), recipient of the 1983 Nobel Prize for his work on the evolution of stars, made the case in his book Truth and Beauty, Aesthetics and Motivation in Science published 1987. In my own essay inspired by his thesis [10] Why Beauty is Truth and Truth Beauty  (SiS 50), I argue that the same love of beauty and truth (authenticity) motivates the best artists as much as the best scientists, and hence art and science are completely congruent in that respect. It also seems entirely obvious that nothing can be really understood without being deeply felt, and so a scientist has to be a romantic poet at heart, just as the artist in quest of truth and authenticity must have a scientist’s intuition of coherence and concordance.

In my essay, I stress that transcendence of the mundane is a hallmark of beauty in both science and art. That’s why one should be wary of educationalists who insist on reducing science and mathematics to prosaic everyday experience. That’s also why we should hang onto that dumb inspiration, the sublime feeling of beauty that leaves you lost for words; for that’s what fires the imagination towards great scientific theories and works of art.

Science unfree stultifies and stifles the imagination.  Without imagination (and intuition), real science is impossible. Intuition is the ability to perceive something immediately without conscious reasoning. Imagination goes one step further: it is the ability to bring to mind images and ideas that are not immediately present to the senses. It is to take off on a flight of fancy to purvey the entire universe in your mind’s eye.

Albert Einstein (1879-1955) said of discovering the laws of physics [11]: “There is no logical way to the discovery of these elemental laws. There is only the way of intuition, which is helped by a feeling for the order lying behind the appearance.”

Richard Feynman (1918-1988) was among the greatest scientists of the 20th century, and perhaps the most imaginative. In a monumental book The Character of Physical Law, which lays bare the profound mysteries of the physical universe and its uneasy relationship to mathematics for the uninitiated, he wrote [12]: “A new idea is extremely difficult to think of. It takes a fantastic imagination.”

William Ian Beardmore Beveridge (1908-2006) in The Art of Scientific Investigation published in 1957 said [13]: “Facts and ideas are dead in themselves, and it is the imagination that gives life to them.” (It goes without saying that you must also follow imagination with rational thought to succeed.)

Science and imagination go together, and the only way to ensure they stay together is to have an education that includes both science and art, whatever the specialization. Many universities in the United States already require a course on calculus for those majoring in the arts and humanities and art courses for scientists. Richard Feynman is a wonderful role model; not only did he play the bongo drums and other musical instruments superbly; he also learned to paint well enough to put on a one-man show, turned himself into an expert on Mayan culture on demand, became a critic of science education, a biologist if only briefly, a lock-picker, and many other things in response to challenges and opportunities that came his way [14].

How to liberate science & imagination?

How can we liberate science and the imagination? We need to promote openness and transparency above all. Public debates over scientific disagreements should be encouraged, and in terms that the public can understand. Critical science literacy should be promoted for the public as well as policy-makers, so that it is not just the word of one ‘expert’ against another. Politicians should never fall into the trap of assuming that what the majority of scientists say must be right. Never trust politicians who are science illiterate. Science should be evidence-based for all to judge for themselves.  There is nothing special about scientific evidence. It is like any other kind of evidence, and must be judged accordingly.

We need to support ‘mavericks’ and ‘dissenters’, for they are most likely the real innovators. Unfortunately, they are often isolated, if not ostracized, as the trend is to support bigger and bigger groups doing conventional and often boring and useless research. Every group should include people who go beyond the status quo, and indeed, research proposals should be judged by how far they go beyond the status quo, because that’s what doing science is all about. True scientists are radicals at heart.

Finally, scientists should be working closely with those whom their research most directly affects, for example, agricultural scientists should be working closely with farmers. Scientists should be encouraged to take part in solving real problems for society.

You will no doubt say: How can scientists get the funding they need and still remain free and independent?

There has been a suggestion of a levee on industry to support independent research on risks of products that they are promoting. In my view, the independence and freedom of scientists to publish and tell the truth must be guaranteed by law, no matter who is supporting their research. This is beneficial for all concerned, especially in the long run.

I have been asked if we can ever ensure that science is used for democratic and socially just aims while it is being used (and funded) by a capitalist system (see [15] Mae-Wan Ho on Science and Democracy, SiS 51). My answer is: It depends on what you call a capitalist system.  Is a cooperative system of collective ownership capitalist? Is a system in which a few corporations control the whole world an inevitable outcome of capitalism? I very much take the view that given the right kind of science, say, an organic science fully acknowledging the cooperation and reciprocity that sustain nature (as opposed to the current reductionist paradigm of competition and exploitation), the appropriate political system will emerge to guarantee that science will be used for democratic and socially just ends.

To conclude

In summary, in order to liberate science and the imagination, we must

Article first published 09/01/13


  1. Ho MW. Genetic Engineering Dream of Nightmare? The Brave New World of Bad Science and Big Business, Third World Network, Gateway Books, MacMillan, Continuum, Penang, Malaysia, Bath, UK, Dublin, Ireland, New York, USA, 1998, 1999, 2007 (reprint with extended Introduction).
  2. Ho MW. The corporate takeover of science. Review of Captive State: The Corporate Takeover of Britain, by George Monbiot, Macmillan, London, 2000,
  3. Ho MW. The Rainbow and the Worm, the Physics of Organisms, World Scientific, 1993, 2nd edition, 1996, 3rd enlarged edition, 2008, Singapore and London.
  4. Ho MW. Living, green & circular. Science in Society 53, 20-23, 2012.
  5. Ho MW and Lim LC. The Case for a GM-Free Sustainable World, Independent Science Panel Report, Institute of Science in Society and Third World Network, London and Penang, 2003; republished GM-Free, Exposing the Hazards of Biotechnology to Ensure the Integrity of Our Food Supply, Vitalhealth Publishing, Ridgefield, Ct., 2004 (both available from ISIS online bookstore
  6. Ho MW, Bunyard P, Saunders PT, Bravo E and Gala R. ISIS and TWN, London and Penang, 2006.
  7. Ho MW,  Burcher S, Lim LC, et al. Food Futures Now, Organic, Sustainable, Fossil Fuel Free, ISIS and TWN, London, 2008.
  8. Ho MW, Cherry B, Burcher S and Saunders PT. Green Energies, 100 % Renewables by 2010, ISIS/TWN, London, Penang, 2009,
  9. Quantum Jazz Biology, Medicine, & Art. Di you miss the science/art “event of a life time”? ISIS, 5 May 2011,
  10. Ho MW. Why beauty is truth and truth beauty. Science in Society 50, 32-37, 2011.
  11. Einstein A. cited in Beveridge WIB. The Art of Scientific Investigation, Norton, New York, 1957.
  12. Feynman RP. The Character of Physical Law, 1965, with an Introduction by Paul Davis, Penquin Books, London, 1992.
  13. Beveridge WIB. The Art of Scientific Investigation, Norton, New York, 1957.
  14. Feyman RP. “Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feyman!” Adventures of a Curious Character, Bantam Books, New York, 1988.
  15. Mae-Wan Ho on science & democracy, Interview by Emma Hughs of Red Pepper magazine. Science in Society 51, 14-17, 2011.

Got something to say about this page? Comment

Comment on this article

Comments may be published. All comments are moderated. Name and email details are required.

Email address:
Your comments:
Anti spam question:
How many legsdoes a tripod have?

There are 3 comments on this article so far. Add your comment above.

DR. MICHAEL CLARJEN-ARCONADA Comment left 10th January 2013 11:11:29
Indeed Liberating Science and Imagination! ... "Science, as much as the arts and humanities, needs to be thoroughly integrated into the social, cultural and political fabric of society". Such liberation and integration are best accomplished by Living the Code: Return to the Ecological Garden. The sine qua non of the Ecological Communities Project. Please watch the video on YouTube on the above mentioned theme by clicking the link below. The eternal dreams of humans … and the relationship between humanity and the cosmos can be best cultivated and manifested by Living the Code: Return to the Ecological Garden. We human beings as we put our hands in the earth, we reconnect with Nature and the Cosmos, and we find who we really are: spirit beings who have decided to materialize on Planet Earth. As we cultivate Gardens we human beings learn how energy works in its myriad forms, and we recognize basic archetypes which serve as the fundamental art forms impregnating Nature and the Cosmos: the logarithmic expansion and contraction of spirals (Yin and Yang). In essence we can say that these archetypal forms are the basis of all forms of art. We can engage in philosophical understanding of the Universe(s): from One (Divine Consciousness itself) into 2 (the dynamic interplay of the complementary opposites of Yin and Yang), and from 2 (Yin and Yang) into the myriad forms of the logarithmic spirals … materializing (matter=energy) in the endless creations in the Universe(s). Let us use these archetypal forms in a territory of spirit: Living the Code: Return to the Ecological Garden. Through this simple process we learn also fundamental laws that operate in Nature: From One Grain (Seed) Ten Thousand Grains (Seeds). We learn this fundamental biological law, which constitutes a Law of Harmony and Abundance. We recognize Optimal Ratios, and learn how to share because we have more than we need. Living the Code: Return to the Ecological Garden enable us best how to cultivate our consciousness and connect with the Source (Divine Consciousness), thereby enjoying the benefits-blessings of Union. We also learn the ancient Chinese ideogram: Food is Medicine. By Living the Code: Return to the Ecological Garden, we recognize optimal ratios present in eco-systems: the optimal ratios (and numbers) of human beings to gardens, the optimal ratios of gardens to human beings and animals (working together in an optimal permaculture system), the optimal ratios of gardens to humans, animals, raw preserved nature, and building structures ... for the attainment of genuine environmental sustainable development. Living the Code: Return to the Ecological Garden, establishes a clear order of priorities in the Continuum Human beings - Families - Communities - Societies: Clean Water - Clean Food - Clean Shelter / Building Materials / Structures - Clean Energy Systems. It is around the garden that we can best practice methods of self-regeneration / self-transformation: meditation - yoga - contemplation of nature - Qi gong in particular for its simple methodology and powerful effects, that anyone can master. In addition all Humanities (including Arts and Crafts) can be optimally introduced around the Ecological Garden as a source of inspiration and creative nourishment.   A practical part of these eternal dreams of humans centers also in solving the most important problems human beings have created: the progressive detachment from Nature, its contamination and degradation by human actions, and the sequelae of poverty, disease, conflict, violence and oppression present in society. I have coined the Code: Return to the Ecological Garden, as the optimal catalytic course of action for the regeneration of human beings - families - communities - societies - planet earth; and the building of the new civilization of Ecological Communities. A peaceful revolution to manifest the new civilization of Ecological Communities begins within each person, as we learn to identify the principles that operate in nature and apply them to our everyday life. The ancient Chinese ideogram: Food is Medicine constitutes the root(s) upon which we can develop natural health methods to regenerate ourselves and the environment in which we live. Let us identify and cultivate the fundamental daily practices to transform ourselves and our communities to optimal levels of health. Yes ... liberating science and the imagination in society! As we witness the fall down of old reductionistic scientific paradigms and their accompanying oppressive corporate systems, we can guide their fall and nurture the emergence of the new civilization of Ecological Communities by implementing the Code. The Code: Return to the Ecological Garden, also includes powerful principles and methods of organization: Let us implement such Open Code globally: Full Transparency and Accountability in Open Government - Open Comprehensive Master Plans - Civic Commons Matrix - Ecological Communities Project. Let us take decisive action in such optimal direction ... and inspire others to do the same. All the best, Michael -- Dr. Michael T. Clarjen-Arconada (305) 926 9679 USA (34) 656 434 443 Spain SKYPE: AMBERWAVESHEALTH Director of Research and Program Implementation ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES PROJECT Coordinator East-End Clean Water Working Group

kundalinirising Comment left 10th January 2013 11:11:57
Hi All, When science decides to incorporate the cosmic 12 base mathemathics system into planet earth then science and mathematics will be able to join the Kosmos energy system. Until then we are stuck in an energy system that sucks quantum instead of replenishing the quantum with a back flow return system. Check out natural electromagnetic field alignment "Yan-Yun" flow. Thoughts from a Fellow Kosmic Voyager.

Todd Millions Comment left 20th January 2013 11:11:02
If I might propose a tenth item on your conclusion- Advertizing has being deductable as a 'research expense',since the early 1930's in the USA.My notes on when this was incorparated into the Canadian tax codes(gradually)are lost(destroyed) and I never had firm info on Britian or Europe.Or the simalar creep of public relations and perception managment into the same tax brackets.It would go a great long way too having these activities moved too a swingling sin tax rate(80-200%).Even for arts courses like -economics.

search | sitemap | contact
© 1999 - 2016