|
ISIS Report 22/02/10
Can The People Save The Climate?
A colourful and radical People’s Summit stole the show at Copenhagen for the real solutions to climate change Sam Burcher
Please circulate widely and repost, but you must give the URL of the original and preserve all the links back to articles on our website
The
UN COP 15 Climate Summit talks, widely considered a disaster [1] was obviously
not the place to be in Copenhagen. Instead the place to be was the Klimaforum09,
organized by a handful of Denmark’s veteran environmental groups to provide an
open forum for the voices of many grassroots movements left out of the official
talks, in particular those from the global South. More than 15 000 flocked to
the People’s Summit in the vast DGI-Byen sports hall at the centre of Copenhagen to share positive solutions for climate change (see Box).
The People’s Declaration
The People’s Declaration was prepared in the
run-up to COP15 and has been signed by 500 organizations and numerous
individuals, and is open for signing until March 2010 [2]. It acknowledges the
need for the following:
•
A complete abandonment of fossil fuels within the next 30 years, which
must include specific milestones for every 5-year period. It demands an
immediate cut in greenhouse gas for industrialized countries of at least 40
percent compared to 1990 levels by 2020.
•
Recognition, payment and compensation of climate debt for the overconsumption
of atmospheric space and adverse effects of climate change on all affected
groups and people.
•
A rejection of purely market-oriented and technology-centred false and
dangerous solutions such as nuclear energy, agro-fuels, carbon capture and
storage, Clean Development Mechanisms, biochar, genetically “climate-readied”
crops, geo-engineering, and reducing emissions from deforestation and forest
degradation (REDD), which deepen social and
environmental conflicts.
•
Real solutions to climate crisis based on safe, clean, renewable, and
sustainable use of natural resources, as well as transitions to food, energy,
land, and water sovereignty.
Change
the world by changing the corporations
José
Bové, the legendary anti-GMO activist turned Green MEP, delivered a passionate
speech in French. Diversity is important, he said [3]. This is a new era, a
historical moment is being created, the end of the 20th Century.
This means that the world is no longer a commodity. We said it in Seattle and we say it here in Copenhagen that the earth is not owned by humanity. But it
is in peril. We can’t construct anything new or continue like this. We don’t
have a planet B and we have to sleep and work on this earth. We have to
protect ecological systems to ensure that warming does not exceed 2 degrees
Celsius. The wealthy countries resist it because of the dominance of
transnational corporations – they are responsible for the carbon mines in Australia. Monsanto is responsible for destroying forests and planting soya and bringing
GM fodder into Europe. We won’t change the risks the world is facing unless we
change the corporations. We can’t continue with the WTO that serves them.
From this UN Summit on climate change, we have
to see the organization of a new vision for the UN, Bové said. It is the
organization that has to fight at the international level to protect the basic
rights of people against the corporations. We need the UN to bring this debate
into the UN and give it a new form, a national policy. We need to help the
people in the South to fight for the ecological comeback of harmony,
solidarity, and goodness so that we can live together on Mother Earth.
Commitment
to future generations
Marina
Silva, a former Brazilian Federal Senate Environment Minister, turned Green
Party politician said, We are here all of us united. We do not accept what the
leaders of our countries have tried to convince us of. They say that we
shouldn’t have high expectations. We are here because we are committed to
life, to the planet and to future generations. I have come from the
Rainforest. We now see the fruits of a reduction of 2 billion tonnes of carbon
because of reforestation. It is important that our countries commit to goals.
We do not want to raise the temperature above 1.5 degrees. We are committed to
an alliance between people to save all of the forest. In Brazil we have most of the technological solutions to the problems of global warming. We
know what to do. We have ethical commitments to change the predatory model
that is destroying the planet.
Rich countries should no longer hide behind
differentiated responsibility, Marina Silva said. They must take us to a strict
reduction of at least an 80 percent reduction by 2050. We are working hard to
commit to our goals in Brazil. But it is like a moving target. We don’t have
the financial needs to help developing countries change their method of
development. Developed countries are just thinking about business, they must
know that they are completely behind the 21st Century ethical
commitment for rights and benefits for the next generation.
Via
Campesina spreads the message of agroecology
The
Climate Caravan representing grassroots activists, farmers and scientists from
the Andes, Africa, Brasilia, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Indonesia, India, Panama,
Paraquay, Peru, Phillipines, Mexico, and from Maori and Pacific rights groups
arrived by buses at the People’s Summit. They came to spread the message of the
science of sustainable agriculture known as agroecology. Agroecology has
developed through social and agricultural movements such as the Via Campesina,
who put a modern twist on their grandparent’s farms by integrating the
principles of biodiversity and applying those practices scientifically to
contemporary sustainable agricultural systems [4].
It is estimated that some 600 thousand farmers in southern countries
have taught each other agroecological methods to remediate climate change. A
joint study between Via Campesina and Food First, a US agricultural think tank,
comprised 45 farmer/ researcher technician teams that surveyed almost a
thousand pairs of farms that had either been practicing agroecological
techniques learned through the movement, or were using conventional fertilizers
and pesticides [5]. The results showed that the farmers using agroecological
methods had 20-40 percent more topsoil, had half as many land-slides, much less
soil erosion and most importantly had fewer economic losses after Hurricane
Mitch struck Central America a decade ago killing eleven thousand people.
Leave the oil in the soil
As
the world leaders continue to debate the official solutions, the grassroots
movement for climate justice worldwide is forging their own solutions on the
ground. The
Climate Caravan is against the solutions proposed by the WTO in Geneva and at Copenhagen that aim to make money out of climate crises via the carbon and
agrofuel markets. Instead,
their agenda
promotes food sovereignty (the principle of securing food for all), local and
traditional farming/fisheries, and guaranteeing the rights of forest people
against deforestation.
The
Climate
Caravan members include Focus on the Global South, the Confédération Paysanne from
France and Spain, and OilWatch from Ecuador. OilWatch propose a simple, but
logical solution to climate change, and that is to leave the oil in the soil.
They believe that this is the best solution to fight CO2 emissions and to turn
around forty years of oil exploitation that has had a negative effect on both
the people and the ecology of Ecuador. The Ecuadorian Government is asking the
international community to finance the fact that this oil is not going to be
used under common and differentiated responsibilities in recognition of the
climate debt that the north owes to the South. So far, the German government
has offered
to contribute $1 billion to Ecuador at the
rate of $50 million per year over the
next 20 years towards leaving the oil
in the
ground in Yasuni National Park, a zone of the greatest biodiversity in the world
and home to an un-contacted indigenous tribe [6]. However, OilWatch warns that
this proposal must not be part of REDD on forests, or the carbon markets and
that solutions to climate change can only come from outside the systems that
have created it. Another protestor on the Climate Caravan has survived two attacks
on his life by the Columbian military because he dared to speak out against the
activities of the corporations in Columbia.
The views of OilWatch are
echoed by my fellow UK road protester and journalist George Monbiot, who said at
the Klimaforum, “If Governments are serious about climate change they would
be putting together plans at Copenhagen to determine which part of the reserves
are to be left in the ground [7].” This means switching to renewables and setting
safe limits on how much of the oil, gas and coal reserve can be used to ensure
that we do not breach the all important 2 degrees warming target. George Monbiot
also cautioned that the world is at risk of becoming a grotesque Mordor-like
environment as a consequence of destructive activities such as the extraction
of tar sands in Canada. He said that the best thing that anyone on earth can
do at the moment is go to the tar sands patch in Alberta and occupy that
machinery.
Peaceful protests for Climate Justice
The
Klimaforum also served as a focus for co-ordinating the peaceful protests of Climate
Justice Action [8]. This international organization believes that the global north
owes the south economic and ecological reparations for the climate inequities caused
by intensive industrial development over many years. The Saturday march for Climate
Justice, which attracted as many as 150 000 people, was by and large a peaceful
and joyful procession led by grassroots campaigners, unions, NGOs, wildlife groups
and members of the public to a candlelit vigil outside the official site of the
UN talks – the Bella Centre. Throughout the day there was indiscriminate
targeting of young people dressed in black by the heavy handed Danish police
who had introduced new detention laws in time for the demonstrations. I asked
two youths dressed in black why they were participating in the actions outside
the Bella Centre. “Because we care about the climate and we are vegetarians”,
they replied.
Prince Charles shines a light on agroecology
Meanwhile,
inside the Bella Centre, which had shut its doors to civil society during the
second week of the UN talks, the spirits of the remaining delegates were lifted
by HRH Prince Charles. He warmed to the theme of mitigation of climate change through
agriculture that is genuinely sustainable and protects biodiversity. The
science tells us that it is through the relationship between agriculture and
forestry that the opportunities to avoid the worst consequences of climate
change still exist, he said. “The future of mankind can be assured if we live
as part of nature not apart from her” [9].
At
both the official and parallel climate venues people gathered in groups to bond
and break down the barriers between classes, nations, colour and political
orientations. However, it was much harder to keep track of goings on at the
Bella Centre, especially when important talks and press conferences were
cancelled. Despite this, the city of Copenhagen, the UN and the Klimaforum were
gracious hosts.
The feel good factor associated with the peaceful demonstrations for
climate justice and the quality of the well-organized talks at the Klimaforum, all
added up to a superb show of strength and persistence of the counterculture
movement where the real solutions to climate change will emerge; and where ISIS/TWN report Green Energies - 100%
Renewable by 2050 [10] will have much to offer.
References
1. Khor M. The real tragedy of Copenhagen January 2 2010 Economic
and Political Weekly http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/climate/info.service/2010/20100101/EPW.14305.pdf
2. System Change not Climate Change – The People’s Declaration from
Klimaforum09 http://www.klimaforum09.org/IMG/pdf/A_People_s_Declaration_from_Klimaforum09_-_ultimate_version.pdf
3. A Conference of Global Greens. Copenhagen and Beyond at The
Klimaforum09 14th December 2009.
4. Shattuck A. Growing
Climate Justice. Food First Backgrounder 2009 15:4 Food First –
Institute for Food and Development Policy http://www.foodfirst.org/
5. Lee, P.
Keep the oil in the soil. July 3 2009, http://www.foei.org/en/blog/keep-the-oil-in-the-soilw
6. Holt-Giménez,
Eric. Measuring farmers’ agroecological resistance after Hurricane Mitch in Nicaragua: a case study in participatory, sustainable land management impact monitoring. Agriculture,
Ecosystems & Environment, 2002 93:87-105.
7. George Monbiot on Fossil Fuels http://permaculture.tv/george-monbiot-on-fossil-fuels/
8. http://www.climate-justice-action.org/
9. HRH Prince Charles gives speech at COP15 http://www.bccd.dk/News/General%20News/HRH%20Prince%20Charles%20speaks%20at%20COP15.aspx
10. Ho
MW. Cherry B. Burcher S. and Saunders P. 2009 Green Energies, 100% Renewables
by 2050 Green
Energies 100% Renewables by 2050
|
There are 4 comments on this article so far. Add your comment
| Sam Burcher Comment left 23rd February 2010 14:02:22 Hi, Thank you for your great comments. Check out the TWN Info Service on Climate Change www.twnside.org.sg
| Celia Wilson Comment left 23rd February 2010 08:08:40 I think the size of businesses should be limited. Corporations are too large. Why should the manufacture of confectionary (chocolate, sweets, candy etc) be limited to just four large companies world wide (as has recently happened)? How I am not sure, but the cause of our global problems is produced by the resulting corporate monopolies. We need to lose the incessant drive for excessive competition and control. The 'economies' resulting from mass production are an illusion when you consider what damage such production does to the environment.
Let the little companies grow up through the feet of these giants. As ever, it is people who will make the changes - if only they would...
We are doomed really, when you consider human nature - it will always seek for the quick and easy, cost effective way. | Donnie Macleod Comment left 23rd February 2010 08:08:20 Good report on Bella. Is there any people's action specifically against the governments of the 'accord nations' that wrecked the other (second rate) conference.
E.G. USA, South Africa, India, Brazil, China, Ethiopia. | James Perry Kelly Comment left 12th March 2010 13:01:48 Thank you for reconfirming my faith in Science and scientists (at least in part).
Several years ago I quoted ISIS frequently in U.S. hearings over stem cells and cloning. I discontinued my stem cells activism when my former political and social allies became my opponents over global warming. Today, due to conflicting reports concerning a purported scientific "consensus" regarding the existence (or non-existence) of man-made global warming, I remembered ISIS and came here seeking truth. I'm glad to see that the same people I agreed with regarding stem cells (you) also confirm my personal observations and common sense concerning global warming. Thank you again for prioritizing mankind and Earth in your rational positions.
Sincere regards,
James P. Kelly |
| |
|