ISIS Report 10/06/09
Water and Fire
Can Water Burn?
The case of salt water that can be ignited when exposed to a radio frequency
beam and what it could tell us about the structure of water Dr.
Mae-Wan Ho
A fully referenced
and illustrated version of this article is posted on ISIS members’ website.
Details here
An electronic version of the full report can be downloaded from the ISIS online
store. Download Now
MATERIAL ON THIS SITE MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM
WITHOUT EXPLICIT PERMISSION. FOR PERMISSION, AND REPRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS, PLEASE
CONTACT ISIS. WHERE PERMISSION IS GRANTED ALL LINKS MUST REMAIN UNCHANGED
Water-powered cars and welding torches that burn
water have been ricocheting around the web for some years, but are impossible
to pin down as they typically depend on a proprietary or otherwise ill-defined
process that somehow causes water to release flammable gas(es).
A recent report caught my eye as the
experimental details at least, are quite well described and documented.
The cancer cure that turned into burning water
Retired broadcast engineer and inventor John Kanzius
was trying to find a cure for cancer when he stumbled upon a way of setting
fire to water. He had made a radiofrequency generator intending to kill cancer
cells loaded up with metal nanoparticles. When he aimed the radio waves
on a test tube of salt water, it produced an unexpected spark. Kanzius put
a lighted match to top of the water, and the water ignited and kept on burning
for as long as it remained in the radio frequency field. The phenomenon was
reproduced on YouTube [1] for the benefit of the local TV station. Independent
witnesses verified that the flame was burning at 1 500 degrees C, and the
heat was strong enough to run a small Stirling engine.
The YouTube video attracted the attention of Rustum Roy – Distinguished
Prof of Materials at Arizona State University and Professor of the Solid State
and of Geochemistry at Pennsylvania State University - who followed up the
research, and held a public demonstration in September 2007, which was reported
in the National Geographic News [2]. George Sverdrup, a technology manager
at the US Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden
Colorado was impressed: “It seems like, to me, an
interesting set of processes that’s been uncovered,” he said.
So what exactly was uncovered? Further
details were published in a preliminary report in the March 2008 issue of
Materials Research Innovations, a journal edited by Rustum Roy [3].
Fuel from salt water is possible
The published paper [3] describes how having confirmed the observation on
YouTube in John Kanzius’ lab in Erie, Philadelphia, the radiation source was
brought to Roy’s microwave lab at Penn State University for a series of experiment
[4].
The maximum power for most experiments was about 300 W and the
frequency of the polarized radio frequency beam was in the range of 13.56
MHz.
The radio wave was aimed at pyrex test tubes containing solutions
of 0.1 to 30 percent salt (NaCl), held upright by a Teflon stand and individually
introduced into the RF (radio frequency) cavity. The gases at the top of the
liquid surface were lit by means of a lighter. The solutions typically sustained
a continuous flame till the water was exhausted. The temperature of the flame
was about 1 800 C. At 3 percent NaCl (about sea water concentration), the
results presented in the YouTube were confirmed.
Larger flame sizes of about 4-5 inches were obtained with higher
salt concentrations. Immediately after the power is turned on, the
flammable gas can be ignited, and it extinguishes instantly as the power is
turned off. The smallest flame was sustained at 1 percent NaCl (see Figure
1).
Figure 1. Burning water at different
NaCl concentrations; a, 0.3 percent; b, 3.0 percent; c, 30 percent
In search of a mechanism
The phenomenon is real, but the mechanism is entirely unknown. Roy and coworkers
suggest specific resonant coupling of the RF radiation into the structure
of water causing the split into “intimately mixed” hydrogen and oxygen. When
ignited, the hydrogen burns regenerating water or steam. They also showed
that the Raman spectrum of the saline solutions before and after exposure
to Kanzius’ RF field differ dramatically in the 3000 to 3500 cm-1
region indicating that the structure of the water after exposure to the RF
field has been very substantially changed, specifically with respect to the
O-H bond. Raman spectroscopy is a technique used in condensed matter physics
and chemistry to study the modes of vibrations of ions or atoms in solids
and liquids
Electrolytic splitting of water is well-known. But, as first
demonstrated by Faraday, it takes >1.23V to split water into hydrogen and
oxygen. The 13.56 MHz RF beam delivers at most 10-8 of the energy
required. The resonant coupling into the structure of water that is proposed
for the spectacular Kanzius radiation effects may
also be due to the specific polarization of the beam used. Roy and colleagues
have previously demonstrated in a long series of papers that polarized, very
weak electromagnetic fields have profound effects even on solid state materials.
Using specific polarized radiation,
radically different phases were synthesized and direct decrystallization of
many solids was induced, including the most important phases in the electronic
industry: ferrites, barium titanates, and even elemental silicon. In
those experiments, 2.45 GHz radiation in a single mode cavity generated the
dramatic changes that were documented by X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission
electron microscopy, and Raman spectroscopy [5].
Thus, it is possible that weak electromagnetic fields, appropriately
polarized could couple resonantly to certain critical structures in the liquid
water that cause the splitting into hydrogen and oxygen.
Roy and colleagues point out [6] that in analogy to crystalline
condensed matter such as SiO2 - which is very closely related to
H2O in the glassy phase - n number of different phases can
coexist in water. So liquid water is by no means homogeneous; and numerous
different water structures on the nanometre scale are certain to co-exist.
Under different influences, the distributions
of these structures will change. That may explain why no two ice crystals
are ever the same, which Masaru Emoto has exploited to great effect in deciphering
‘messages from water’ [7] (Crystal
Clear – Messages from Water SiS 15).
Roy and colleagues also suggest that water can be ‘imprinted’
by different surfaces and solutes through a process analogous to a phenomenon
well known in material science. Epitaxy – the transmission of structural information
from the surface of one material (usually a crystalline solid) to another
(usually a liquid) – occurs without any transfer of material [6]. The
result is to induce the liquid to change its structure in the region close
to the crystalline substrate, and possibly precipitate or crystallize in a
pre-determined structure or morphology, the stuff of homeopathy and the putative
memory of water.
We have featured a well-documented investigation using the physical
technique of thermoluminescence in 2003 {8] (Water Remembers? Homeopathy
Explained? SiS 19) that is compatible with epitaxy.
In [9] Living with Oxygen (SiS
43) and other articles in this series, we shall be exploring how water can
burn in different ways, drawn from research emerging in the mainstream scientific
literature; all in the interest of deciphering all the exciting things nature
is trying to tell us.
|
There are 1 comments on this article so far. Add your comment
| Philip Ward Comment left 6th September 2009 17:05:21 The leap from these experiments to homeopathy is going too far. There is no evidence for the effectiveness of homeopathic treatment and the idea that water has a "memory" which is more potent with dilution is laughable. How come this "memory" is only operative for purposes that are beneficial to health?
The suggestion that 13.56MHz is insufficiently energetic (by a factor of 10^8) to break O-H bonds is misleading in this context: it leads to suggestion that somehow this experiment defies the Law of Conservation of Energy, when this is explicitly denied in the Materials Research Innovations paper. The Raman spectra of the solution before and after the experiment don't look radically different: they look similar, apart from a minor difference in peak intensities. The reference to microwave exposure on solids is also misleading. Certain solids (and liquids)heat up in microwave, as we all know: this is used to synthesise some compounds in the solid state.
I can't find any references to independent replication of this experiment. |
|