Developmental biologists traced glyphosate birth defects to key morphogen and signalling genes Dr. Mae-Wan Ho
This report has been submitted to the US Environment Protection Agency and the European Food Safety Authority, please circulate widely to your political representatives and demand a worldwide ban on glyphosate herbicides
It started in 2002, two years after the large scale introduction of Roundup Ready soybeans to Argentina . People were reporting birth defects from exposure to glyphosate sprays during pregnancy; and the problem got worse.
In regions where glyphosate-based herbicides are used, specific neural defects and craniofacial malformations were reported. This prompted Prof. Andrés Carrasco, director of the Laboratory of Molecular Embryology at the University of Buenos Aires Medical School into action. He and his colleagues carried out a laboratory study on the effects of glyphosate on the development of frog embryos. They found the same kinds of abnormalities in frog embryos incubated with a 5 000 fold diluted solution of the Roundup herbicide . The findings were so serious that Carrasco decided to release the results before publication  (Glyphosate Herbicide Could Cause Birth Defects Glyphosate Herbicide Could Cause Birth Defects, SiS 43), and in May 2009, the Environmental Lawyers Association of Argentina initiated a lawsuit to ban the herbicide.
In April 2010, the first official report commissioned by the State Government of Chaco documented a four-fold increase in both cancer and birth defects in the ten years of 2000 - 2009 .
These findings are the latest addition to a long chain of evidence linking glyphosate (and others herbicides) to serious health impacts at concentrations well below the level of recommended agricultural use. In the case of glyphosate herbicides, links to cancers, miscarriages and other reproductive toxicities, liver and cell toxicities, DNA damages, lethality to amphibians and endocrine disrupting action previously made, would more than justify a worldwide ban ( (Ban Glyphosate Herbicides Now, SiS 43); quite apart from simultaneous evidence of ecological/agronomic disasters caused by the herbicide ( Scientists Reveal Glyphosate Poisons Crops and Soil, SiS 47), while the spread of glyphosate resistant weeds and superweeds has rendered the GM crop and the herbicide practically useless ( GM Crops Facing Meltdown in the USA, SiS 46).
In the first experiment, Xenopus laevis (the African ‘clawed toad’, which is really a frog) embryos were incubated with high dilutions of a commercial glyphosate based herbicide (Roundup Classic, Monsanto). The embryos were exposed from the 2-cell stage with dilutions of the herbicide at 3 000-, 4 000-, and 5 000-fold (the most dilute equivalent to 430 mm of glyphosate). They found highly abnormal embryos in the regions of the head and central nervous system, and shortening of the anterior-posterior axis, even at the highest dilution. These led to deformities in the head cartilages at tadpole stage.
The second experiment indicated that the abnormalities were due to the herbicide glyphosate rather than the adjuvants in the Roundup formulation. The early frog embryos were injected with pure glyphosate, and they developed very similar defects. Injection of glyphosate into one cell at the two cell stage showed that the effects were restricted to the injected cell, with the non-injected cell acting as a control (see Fig 1).
Figure 1 Effect of glyphosate injection; left to right: control embryo not injected with glyphosate; embryo injected in one cells only; and embryo injected in both cells
The researchers then treated chick embryos with glyphosate-based herbicides and found similar defects. There was a gradual loss of head features including the future eyes, and the embryos ended up with microcephaly (small head).
To pin down the effect of glyphosate further, a reporter gene assay was carried out, which revealed that glyphosate treatment increased retinoic acid (RA) activity in the frog embryos. RA is an oxidized form of vitamin A well-known to have an important role in determining the anterior and posterior axis in embryonic development. That is why excess intake of vitamin A during pregnancy is advised against, as it can cause birth defects.
As consistent with glyphosate causing the malformations through increasing RA activity, the RA antagonist (Ro 41-5253) rescued (prevented) the teratogenic effect of glyphosate.
A previous study had indicated that women exposed during pregnancy to herbicides delivered offspring with congenital malformations, including microcephaly, anencephaly (no head), and cranial (head skeleton) malformations .
The increase in RA activity caused by glyphosate herbicides is also consistent with the decrease in expression of several genes in the abnormal embryos: Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signalling from the embryonic dorsal midline and otx2.
In humans, shh deficiency is associated with a holoprosencephaly syndrome (failure of forebrain development into two lobes), with a frequency of 1/250 of pregnancies and 1/10 000 of live births. Failure of Shh signalling is associated with head and face abnormalities in mice, zebrafish and the chick.
An excess of RA is also known to down regulate otx2 expression in Xenopus, chicken and mouse embryos. Otx2 in turn is necessary for the expression of shh in the ventral midbrain. All the evidence indicates that RA signalling, otx2, and shh are part of a genetic cascade critical for the development of the brain and craniofacial skeleton. Glyphosate inhibits the anterior expression of shh, reduces the domain of otx2, prevents the subdivision of the eye field (see Fig. 1), and impairs craniofacial development.
Sublethal doses of the herbicide (430 mM of glyphosate in 1/ 5 000 dilution of the glyphosate based herbicide and injections leading to a final concentration of 8 to 12 mM of glyphosate in the injected side of the embryo were sufficient to induce serious disturbances in the expression of otx2 and shh and other genes. These molecular phenotypes were correlated with a disruption of developmental mechanisms involving the neural crest, embryonic dorsal midline formation and head patterning.
So how does glyphosate increase RA in the embryo to trigger the series of gene expression and developmental abnormalities?
RA activity is regulated by the degradation of RA by the CYP26 enzymes, these enzymes are members of the cytochrome P450 family (same as aromatase, which glyphosate inhibits). So it is possible that glyphosate increases RA by inhibiting the enzyme that degrades RA.
Actually, glyphosate is a generalized chelator (binder) of metal ions with systemic effects on many key enzymes that depend on multivalent ions (see  Glyphosate Tolerant Crops Bring Diseases and Death, SiS 47). As cytochromes are iron-containing heme-based enzymes, it would not be surprising if glyphosate inhibits RA degradation through binding the heme-iron. What is becoming clear is that glyphosate can poison crops, soils, wild life, livestock, human beings and the entire ecosystem in multiple systemic ways, and a global ban is long overdue.
Article first published 04/10/10
Got something to say about this page? Comment
There are 9 comments on this article so far. Add your comment above.
S. Allen Comment left 16th October 2010 18:06:41
Councils have a 'Duty of Care', that means if they spray a public place they have to go beyond standard procedures to ensure the publics safety. Should councils breach their 'Duty of Care' it may be very costly for them in court. They may also face charges of misconduct from the CMC [ CRIME AND MISCONDUCT COMMISION ]. Don't let them get away with it. Send letters to the editor. Ask your local newspaper how to write your letters so as they can print them without fear of being sued. Take photos for evidence Good Luck
Dianne Comment left 5th October 2010 23:11:27
10 years ago, i presented a report to my local council about Roundup from the research that was available. I have Multiple Chemical Sensitivity and when the council sprayed, I would end up so sick. They ignored my health effects, they also ignored the research I presented and kept using it. Even with this information, studies showing it causes cancer & birth defects, they will continue to keep using it, until someone bans it. They just dont believe the studies - WHY?
David R.(Canada) Comment left 5th October 2010 16:04:18
It sounds like these guys in Brazil have gone to an extreem to prove their point! Dotted all the i's and crossed all the t's. And about time too. It'll be very interesting to see how the media and Monsanto et al are going to spin this one! Hopefully this will end the GMO debate quickly as it will no longer be profitable to grow them. But of course they're moving into GMO animals (eg salmon) now so we'll have to wait for that one to blow up in their face.
Alex Comment left 4th November 2011 20:08:53
Is this considered a scholarly journal?
Sue Ross Comment left 14th March 2012 17:05:30
Concerend about our community garden being sprayed with roundup bio active. Could this behazardous?
Mae-Wan Ho Comment left 14th March 2012 17:05:54
Sue Ross, Please stop that spraying right away! It could be very hazardous indeed.
Jennifer Hutchison Comment left 4th September 2012 01:01:48
My son has a "rare" neuromigrational disorder called Lissencephaly. In his case it is a result of a missense mutation on X. I find it interesting that some states in the US have many cases of this malformation as well as holoprosencephaly, anacephaly, and various assortments of malformations like agenesis of corpus callosum. I was raised in MI. It is wildy common there as well as PA, CA, TX, MO, KS, OH, UT (more common to have microcephaly and deteriorating grey matter from unknown causes. All of these states have heavy GM pharming and hydrofracking. I am assured that it is a coincidence and NOT because I grew up between Dow and Upjohn and downwind of Michigan State's experimental farms. I am not so sure. 1 in 250,000 live births yet I personally know 50 families just in western Michigan with children with this rare malformation. Not to fear- common forms of lissencephaly on chromosome 17 and X are being re-expressed thru redundancies : P Thanks, but no thanks science.
Ann Comment left 4th March 2014 05:05:00
Glyphosate has been proven to be hazardous in so many ways. Monsanto has succeeded in getting Roundup (glyphosate) allowed residue levels in our food increased HUGELY, because of the "revolving door" government men & Women in the US USDA and FDA. These levels are far above what is necessary to cause health effects in people. Those of us who know these things are ready to bang the walls of Congress with their ignorance.
Alex Jones Comment left 27th May 2014 06:06:03
I would like to acknowledge the recent death of Professor Andres Carrasco of Argentina. He was an independent scientist, a leading embryologist and, importantly, he was an activist trying to protect the health of rural communities against the aerial spraying of Glyphosate on Genetically Modified Soy. - It was his ground-breaking research into the negative effects of Glyphosate on embryos that exposed the link between the aerial spraying of Glyphosate on the GM Soy crops and the horrible birth defects in those children living nearby. - I pay tribute to his good work and I thank him for not being fearful of exposing the truth against strong and sometimes violent opposition to the truth. There is no doubt in my mind that we are united in our cause today because of the great efforts of independent scientists such as Professor Carrasco. Our condolences go to his family, friends and colleagues. MAY HE REST IN PEACE. Alex Jones www.pesticideactiongroupwa.com