|
The Biotechnology Debate has United the World against
Corporate Rule
Mae-Wan Ho
International Forum on Globalisation Teach-in, Seattle 27 November, 1999
I joined the biotechnology debate in 1994 because my friends from the
Third World Network inspired me with their selfless dedication to equity,
justice, democracy, compassion, in short, all the human ideals that are
severely under threat, especially from the biotech industry. These same
ideals have brought us out here in droves today. The biotechnology debate
has united the world, and all of society in resisting GM crops. It is not
just the Europeans who are refusing to accept them, it is also India,
Japan, Brazil, the whole of South Asia, the entire African Region, South
Korea, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand. In fact, the more real knowledge
people have, the greater their resistance. The debate has captured the
imagination of the global civil society, and becoming part of the biggest,
most inclusive civil rights movement against the corporate empire and the
WTO. We’ve won the first round: Monsanto is to be split up and sold
off, its ag biotech division declared worthless.
I am here on behalf of more than 140 scientists from 27 countries to
deliver an open letter to all government delegates at the WTO, calling for
the immediate suspension of all environmental releases of GM crops and
products on grounds of threats to health and biodiversity and for patents
on life-forms and living processes to be revoked and banned because they
are deeply immoral.
Patents on life-forms and living processes are thefts from nature. They
also expropriate the inventive genius and knowledge accumulated by
indigenous communities and by previous generations of western scientists
who have worked entirely for the public good. These patents threaten food
security, violate basic human rights and dignity, compromise healthcare,
impede medical and scientific research, and are against animal welfare.
There is a lot of misinformation and dis-information put out by the
biotech industry and our governments. Contrary to what they would like the
public to believe, GM crops are neither needed nor beneficial. They are a
dangerous diversion from the real task of providing food and health around
the world. To put it bluntly: the existing technologies are crude,
unreliable, uncontrollable and unpredictable, they don’t qualify as
technologies, let alone patentable inventions. And they are inherently
hazardous. Moreover, these technologies are misguided by a scientific
paradigm which is fundamentally flawed, out of date and in conflict with
scientific findings. They call that sound science. But it is the ultimate
phoney science.
The promises to genetic engineer crops to fix nitrogen, resist drought,
improve yield and to 'feed the world' have been around for at least 30
years. Such promises have built up a multibillion-dollar industry now
controlled by a mere handful of corporate giants.
But the miracle crops have not materialised. So far, two simple
characteristics account for all the GM crops in the world. More than 70%
are tolerant to broad-spectrum herbicides, with companies engineering
plants to be tolerant to their own brand of herbicide, while the rest are
engineered with bt-toxins from a soil bacterium to kill insect pests. A
total of 65 million acres were planted in 1998 within the US, Argentina
and Canada. The latest surveys on GM crops in the US, the largest grower
by far, showed no significant benefit. On the contrary, the most widely
grown GM crops - herbicide-tolerant soya beans - yielded on average 6.7%
less and required two to five times more herbicides than
non-GM varieties.
The same GM crops have already given rise to herbicide-tolerant weeds
and bt-resistant insect pests. Worse still, the broad-spectrum herbicides
not only decimate wild species indiscriminately, but are toxic to animals.
One of them, glufosinate, causes birth defects in mammals, while another,
glyphosate, is now linked to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. GM crops with
bt-toxins kill beneficial insects such as bees and lacewings, and pollen
from bt-maize is lethal to monarch butterflies.
According to the UN food programme, there is enough food to feed the
world one and a half times over. World cereal yields have consistently
outstripped population growth since 1980, but one billion are hungry. It
is on account of corporate monopolies operating under the globalised
economy that the poor are getting poorer and hungrier. Corporations
already control 75% of the world trade in cereals. The new patents on
seeds will intensify corporate monopoly by preventing farmers from saving
and replanting seeds, which is what 80% of the farmers still do in the
Third World. Christian Aid, a major charity working with the Third World,
concludes that GM crops will cause unemployment, exacerbate Third World
debt, threaten sustainable farming systems and damage the environment. It
predicts famine for the poorest countries.
It is clear that GM crops offer no benefits and cannot feed the world.
There are also enormous risks. You know the children's joke of what do you
get when you cross impossible things like a spider with a goat? Part of
the joke is knowing you can't because there are biological barriers
between species which only allow one to cross closely related species such
as horse and donkey, for example. Genetic engineering bypasses all these
barriers, so that is not a joke anymore. Genes are being transferred in
the laboratory between any and every species. Indeed, spider genes have
been transferred into goats in an attempt to make the poor female goats
produce silk in their milk, and human genes have been transferred into
cows, sheep, mice, fish and bacteria.
The most immediate dangers are random and unpredictable, basically
because the genetic engineer cannot control where and how the foreign
genes are integrated into the genetic material of the host. Genetic
engineering animals are acts of cruelty, there are high failure rates and
even the so-called successes are often monstrously deformed. Genetic
engineered plants may end up having new toxins and allergens. Dr. Arpad
Pusztai, an eminent scientist in the Rowett Institute of Scotland, lost
his job when he released findings showing that two GM potato lines were
unexpectedly toxic to rats.
A more insidious danger is horizontal gene transfer - the transfer of
genetic material directly to unrelated species. In genetic engineering,
many viral and bacterial genes are being combined in new combinations that
have never existed before, and introduced into organisms by invasive
methods that make the foreign genes (or transgenic DNA) more likely to
transfer again to unrelated species. Such horizontal gene transfer can
give rise to new viruses and bacteria that cause diseases and spread
antibiotic and drug resistances among the pathogens.
It was because of these concerns that the pioneers of genetic
engineering called for a moratorium in the '70s. Unfortunately, commercial
pressures cut the moratorium short. Since then, drug and antibiotic
resistant infectious diseases have returned with a vengeance. New viruses
are appearing at alarming frequencies, while life-threatening bacteria are
rapidly becoming resistant to all antibiotics and are hence untreatable.
Another hazard is that the transgenic DNA can jump into the genomes of
cells, resulting in harmful effects including cancer. In its interim
report (May 1999), the British Medical Association called for an
indefinite moratorium on the release of GM crops pending further studies
on new allergies, on the spread of antibiotic resistances and on the
effects of transgenic DNA.
These hazards are acknowledged by sources within our Governments. UK
scientists advising the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food are
warning of horizontal transfer of genetically modified DNA.
Unless it changes direction, the whole biotechnology enterprise has
little chance of success, not the least among the reasons being that the
scientific paradigm promoting and misguiding the technology has been
thoroughly discredited at least 15 years before. Genetic has changed out
of all recognition, and yet the old paradigm is still dominating the
scene. The old paradigm offers a simplistic view that the characteristics
or traits of organisms are each tied to specific genes, which are
unaffected by one another or by the environment. And that, except for very
rare random mutations, the genes are passed on unchanged to the next
generation.
Instead, scientific findings within the past 20 years reveal an immense
amount of cross-talk between genes. Genes are nothing if not sensitive,
dynamic and responsive, to other genes, to the cell or organism in which
they find themselves and to the external environment. The layer upon layer
of feedback between genes and environment, not only determine whether
genes are active or not, but what function and structure they have. Genes
can mutate, multiply, rearrange and jump around in response to the
environment. They may even jump out of the genome of one organism to
infect another one. Geneticists have coined the phrase "the fluid
genome" to describe the situation. It is more accurate to see the
genes as having a very complicated ecology, and that for genes and genomes
to remain constant, you need a balanced ecology. So the new genetics is
radically ecological and holistic.
I referred to genetic engineering biotechnology as a hoax back in 1994.
This hoax is perpetrated by an unholy alliance between corporate
capitalism and the discredited scientific paradigm. Together, they mean to
control every aspect of our lives, from the food we eat, to the healthcare
we can receive or not, to the babies we can conceive and give birth to,
and humans beings we can clone. Yes, the first so-called human clone has
already been created by transferring the genetic material of a human being
to a cow’s egg. Mercifully, they destroyed it at day 14, the current
legal limit, before the real Frankenstein monster takes shape. And all
done in the name of scientific progress and free enterprise.
Fortunately, the game is up, the bubble has burst. The tidal wave of
protest is sweeping across the world and has hit the United States. Your
national coalition of family farming groups have taken the lead in
demanding a moratorium on GM crops and a ban on patents of life-forms and
processes. Support your family farmers. When the farmer dies, so dies
America.
While the 'benefits' from GM crops remain illusory and hypothetical, the
successes of sustainable, organic farming are well-documented, in the
Third World, in Latin America, in Europe and North America. There is also
an enormous 'health bonus' in phasing out agrochemicals which are linked
to many forms of cancer, to reproductive abnormalities and degenerative
diseases. An organic revolution in farming is underway all over the world.
What excites me most as a scientist is that there is also an organic
revolution going on in western science, which restores and reaffirms the
holistic, ecological perspectives that many traditional indigenous
cultures have never lost touch with. This organic revolution in western
science will put an end to the dominant culture that treats organisms as
machines and life and life-necessities as commodities, that glorifies
competition and sanctions exploition in the name of the struggle for
survival of the fittest. Instead, we begin to appreciate the universal
entanglement of all nature, which will transform the very meaning and
texture of our lives. The future looks great. Let's go for it.
| |
|
