From the Editor
When corporations rule the world
The Black Hills of South Dakota in the United States are famous for two
gigantic monuments, each sculpted out of a mountain. One, still to be
completed, is in honour of Crazy Horse, Indian leader belonging to the Lakota
tribe, who led his peoples in fierce battles for their right to land and
livelihood against the intruding European settlers. A short distance away, on
land stolen from Crazy Horse and his peoples, is Mount Rushmore, the "shrine of
democracy", complete with the towering faces of four US presidents
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln -
gazing serenely into the distance.
Today, American farmers are fighting for both democracy and their
livelihood against the corporate overlords. Feudalism has returned to farming
in the US and Canada, according to a report published by the Center for Food
Safety.
Farmers buying GM seeds are required to sign technology agreements that
relinquish to Monsanto their right to plant, harvest and sell the GM seeds and
also leave them vulnerable to harassment from the company, such as having their
property investigated, litigations and out of court settlements.
Farmers not buying GM seeds are not spared, as Canadian farmer
Percy Schmeiser learned when he found his fields contaminated by
Monsantos GM canola, and has had to spend years locked in a harrowing
battle with the company accusing him of infringing its patent rights in a legal
system thats on the side of the corporation. He was not alone in being
persecuted by Monsanto, although he was unique in not giving up the fight to
the very end.
To-date, Monsanto has filed 90 lawsuits against American farmers
involving 147 farmers and 39 small businesses, with an estimated $15m gained
from judgments granted in its favour. Since 1999, some 500 farmers have been
investigated and harassed by Monsanto every year. The Center for Food Safety
has set up a hotline for farmers (p.48).
The fight against corporate feudalism is not restricted to North
America. Farmers across the globe have been battling for their livelihood and
their traditional democratic right to plant, harvest, and sell the seeds of
their choice against Monsanto and its subsidiaries pushing GM crops through
hype, half-truths, lies, and even bribery, uncovered recently in Indonesia (see
SiS25).
Indian farmers have been driven into debt and suicide after three
successive years of failed harvests from planting GM cotton since three
varieties were approved for commercial growing in 2002. Independent researchers
and film-makers have documented the failures, and exposed Monsantos trail
of propaganda, including a doctored report attempting to exaggerate the yields
of its GM cotton, thereby substantially reducing the compensation it owes to
farmers for crop failures in Andhra Pradesh. A coalition of ngos called on the
Indian Prime Minister to withdraw Bt cotton, referring to its imposition on
farmers as a "scientific fraud".
Since March 2005, however, the countrys Genetic Engineering
Advisory Committee (GEAC) has approved 22 new varieties of Monsanto-derived Bt
cotton seed for commercial growing, twelve in the central states, four in the
south, six for the first time in the fertile northern state; and eleven new
varieties for large-scale trials in the fertile northern states.
In May 2005, the ngos and farmers organisations in Andhra Pradesh
claimed a significant victory. The GEAC discontinued the commercial cultivation
of all three Monsanto varieties approved in 2002 in the state. This victory in
Andhra Pradesh may spur opposition in other parts of India where the GM cotton
has still to be withdrawn.
Meanwhile, in Iraq, the United States has put in place a new legislation
under "Order 81", which gives protection to "new and improved plant varieties",
paving the way for patenting plant varieties, and for introducing GM crops into
the country. It will effectively bring the countrys agricultural sector
under the control of corporations like Monsanto and Syngenta; and at a time
when Iraq is experiencing a food crisis. Iraq, once self-sufficient in
agriculture, has seen its food production collapse since the first Gulf War;
and more than half of the population is now affected by food insecurity. The
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is ostensibly
helping rebuild Iraqs farming sector under the Agriculture Reconstruction
and Development Program for Iraq, but critics say it is really to help
corporations capitalize on market opportunities.
Science and democracy
Scientists, like farmers, have fallen prey to corporate feudalism; and
there is a disturbing trend within the scientific establishment against
democracy. The latest high profile victim Ignacio Chapela is fighting for
tenure at the University of California at Berkeley - once the hotbed of
radicalism and independence now beholden to Novartis simply because he
and his graduate student had published scientific findings uncomfortable for
the biotech industry. Please help his campaign (http://www.tenurejustice.org/pages/donations.html).
(Note: Chapela has just been granted tenure, to the delight of all his
supporters. This is a most significant victory against corporate feudalism. We
thank him for all the hard work and the hardships he has endured on our
behalf.)
Behind the persecution of scientists who dare to tell the truth are the
many scientists who have given up the fight, or have willingly chosen to serve
the corporate agenda.
As Michael Meacher, ex-environment minister and UK Member of Parliament
points out (p.5), "companies have learned that small investments in endowing
chairs, sponsoring research programmes or hiring professors for out-of-hours
projects can produce disproportionate payoffs in generating reports, articles,
reviews and books, which may not be in the public interest, but certainly
benefit corporate bottom lines." A recent study found that of the five
scientific committees advising the UK government on food and safety, 40 percent
of the committee members had links with the biotech industry, and at least 20
percent were linked to one of the Big Three: Monsanto, AstraZeneca, or
Novartis.
Meacher told a public conference on science, medicine and the law that
we need independent science and scientists who take the precautionary principle
seriously, and called for sweeping changes in science funding and scientific
advice to the government that will ensure the protection of independent
science, and hence, the public.
Science for a sustainable world
As Europe is finalising its Framework Programme 7 for the next round of
public research funding, the Independent Science Panel (ISP) has submitted a
comment to the European Commission, demanding maximum transparency and
democratic input in deciding funding and research priorities, support for
independent science and scientists and explicit funding criteria that includes
ethical and safety considerations.
The ISP also wants a redistribution of research budget away from
industry- and technology-driven areas like genomics and information
technologies towards sustainable agriculture, ecology and energy use in
sustainable systems, and holistic health. This is particularly relevant as the
"gene gold" predicted for the human genome project is rapidly turning to dust
(this issue) and the safety of mobile phones and newer generations of
telecommunication technologies are increasingly called into question (SiS25). At the
same time, evidence is mounting that the most environmentally destructive and
energy intensive aspects of our food production system can all be addressed by
sustainable alternatives (see especially the multiple uses of forests featured
in this issue). More than 200 organisations and individuals from 32 countries
have endorsed the ISP comment so far, including many university professors and
researchers that some of you will recognize. Add your name here
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/ISPF7.php
The relentless march towards corporate feudalism across the globe is
another major reason why no one can afford to do nothing. Please support
the Sustainable World Global Initiative to make our food production
system sustainable, to ameliorate climate change, to guarantee food security
and food sovereignty for everyone, and most of all, to dismantle the corporate
empire: http://www.i-sis.org.uk/SustainableWorldInitiativeF.php
All SiS issues and articles can be accessed on ISIS members
website: http://www-I-sis.org.uk/isisnews.php
|