|
ISIS Report 31/08/04
Pharm Crops for Vaccines and Therapeutic Antibodies
Prof. Joe Cummins warns of
special health impacts of vaccine and antibodies in pharm crops
The extensive references to this
article are posted on ISIS members website.
Details here.
Reckless disregard of known risks
The European Union (EU) recently announced a major program to produce
plant-based vaccines and therapeutic antibodies [1], despite the risks that
came to public attention two years ago [2]. The crops plants currently used to
produce vaccines include tobacco, maize, potato, tomato, rice and alfalfa. In
spite of the threat to the food supply, maize is a favorite crop for vaccine
production because the transgenic protein can be concentrated in the
kernels. In general, field-test releases of crop plants modified for vaccine
production have been undertaken with little regard for the health and
environmental consequences of contaminating food crop with the vaccine
genes.
Risks of vaccine proteins and antibodies
Vaccines are made using antigen proteins from disease organisms such as
viruses or bacteria to elicit production of antibodies following injection into
the blood stream or ingestion with food. Plant-based vaccines are mainly
produced from synthetic transgenes whose DNA code words have been altered for
maximal activity in a crop plant [3]. Apart from vaccines, antibodies are also
produced in plants for treating both animal and plant diseases. These
antibodies are effective, but plagued by the powerful immune response to the
antibodies themselves following repeated exposure.
Plant-based vaccines are mainly geared towards mucosal immunization
following oral intake. Oral vaccines may elicit oral tolerance on repetitive
exposure. Oral tolerance is the animals defence against antigens in food.
Thus, after repeated exposure to an oral antigen, the mucosal immune system
ceases to view the antigen as such, leaving the animal susceptible to the
pathogen for which the vaccine is supposed to protect against [4]. The problem
of oral tolerance has been mentioned in at least one review of plant-based
vaccines [5]. Oral tolerance has been used to treat autoimmune disease such as
diabetes by feeding patients with plants producing an antigen eliciting the
autoimmune response [6]. Oral tolerance to pathogens is one main threat from
the contamination of our food supply with vaccine genes, whereas therapeutic
antibodies threaten a direct immune response; these two impacts are seldom
discussed by promoters of plant genetic modification or by science journals
reporting the studies.
Risks from synthetic genes and viral vectors
Edible plant-based vaccines have been produced with synthetic nuclear
genes, synthetic chloroplast genes or plant viruses modified with synthetic
genes. These synthetic genes are completely unknown and untested for
toxicities. The nuclear transgenes frequently failed to produce sufficient
protein to evoke an oral immune response, while chloroplast transgenes tended
to provide adequate protein levels. (Chloroplasts allow insertion of multiple
transgene copies, with less problem of gene-silencing than nuclear transgene
insertions). Chloroplast transformations produced antigens at high levels, up
to 25% of total soluble protein while nuclear inserts generally produced less
than 1% total soluble protein. The endosperm localization of nuclear gene
products can boost antigen levels to 10% of protein in maize kernels [7].
Numerous plant viruses modified with vaccine antigens have been released
in field tests. Such viruses can produce vaccine antigen up to10% total soluble
protein in the infected plant but 1% is most frequent [8]. Little consideration
has been given to containment of these GM viruses in field tests. They can be
spread by sucking insects, plant wounding or by wind-blown plant debris. A
recent study shows that plant viruses may be spread by wind, either in water
droplets from the plant surface or by abrasive contact between plant leaves
[9].
Box 1 provides a list of 30 human and animal diseases for which
plant-based vaccines have been created. It is worth mentioning that about half
of the transgenic vaccines on the list were produced using plant viruses as
vectors, including tobacco mosaic virus, cowpea mosaic virus, alfalfa
mosaic virus, potato virus X, plum pox poty virus and tomato bushy stunt virus.
The virus constructions are productive but pose special long-term risks
associated with the release of the virus to the environment and predictable
viral recombination to produce novel disease agents. Little effort has been
made to monitor these hazardous experiments.
|
Box 1
Plant-based vaccines [8] |
| Disease agents |
Species protected |
| 1. Enterotoxigenic strains of E. coli |
humans & farmed animals |
| 2. Vibrio cholerae/ Cholera toxin B subunit |
humans |
| 3. Enteropathogenic E. coli/ Pilus structural subunit A |
humans |
| 4. Vibrio cholerae/ Cholera toxin B subunit, rotavirus |
humans |
| 5. Enterotoxigenic strains of E. coli |
humans |
| 6. Hepatitis B virus/ Surface antigen |
humans |
| 7. Hepatitis C virus/ Hypervariable region 1 of envelope protein 2
fused to cholera toxin |
humans |
| 8. Norwalk virus &Rotavirus |
humans |
| 9. Measles/ Haemagglutinin protein |
humans |
| 10. HIV-1/ Peptide of gp41 protein |
humans |
| 11. HIV-1/ V3 loop of gp120 protein |
humans |
| 12. HIV-1/ Peptide of transmembrane protein gp41 |
humans |
| 13. HIV-1/ Nucleocapsid protein p24 |
humans |
| 14. Cytomegalovirus/ Glycoprotein B |
humans |
| 15. Rhinovirus type 14/ Peptide of VP1 protein |
humans |
| 16. Respiratory syncytial virus/ Peptides of G protein |
humans |
| 17. Staphylococcus aureus/ D2 peptide of bronectin-binding
protein FnBP |
humans |
| 18. Pseudomonas aeruginosa/ Peptides of outer-membrane |
humans |
| 19. Protein F Plasmodium falciparum (malaria) & Peptides
of circumsporozoite protein |
humans |
| 20. Human papillomavirus type 16/ E7 oncoprotein |
humans |
| 21. Bacillus anthracis/ Protective antigen |
humans |
| 22. Rabies virus/ Glycoprotein |
humans, domestic & wild animals |
| 23. Foot-and-mouth disease virus/ Structural protein VP1 |
farmed animals |
| 24. Transmissible gastroenteritis virus/ Glycoprotein |
pigs |
| 25. Bovine group A rotavirus/ Major capsid protein VP6 |
cattle |
| 26. Mannheimia haemolytica (bovine pneumonia teurellosis)/
Leukotoxin fused to green fluorescent protein |
cattle |
| 27. Mink enteritis virus/ Peptide of capsid protein VP2 |
mink, dogs & cats |
| 28. Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus/ Structural protein VP60 |
rabbits |
| 29. Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus |
rabbits |
| 30. Canine arvovirus/ Peptide of capsid protein VP2 |
dogs |
Numerous plant based therapeutic antibodies for treating human, animal
and plant diseases have been created and released in field tests. The
antibodies are made from synthetic antibody genes and they are also greatly
influenced by the pattern of glycosylation (sugar modification of protein)
produced in the plant [10]. Further examples of plant-based antibodies include
mice monoclonal antibodies that confer resistance to a herbicide by binding to
it, thus inactivating the herbicide [11]. The antibody-bound herbicide was
inactivated but not destroyed, and its ultimate fate is unknown; presumably it
would be consumed with the transgenic crop. Kholer and Milstein discovered a
method for preparing monoclonal antibodies in 1975 [12]. That discovery has
made an exceptional contribution to the development of clinical analytical
technology and to therapy, but that application has not fulfilled the
expectation of a "magic bullet" for treating disease because the antibodies
provoked a strong immune response if applied repeatedly.
Risks from cancer and HIV vaccines
In the reviews mentioned previously, numerous plant-based vaccines for
treating infectious diseases have been described [7,8]. I shall now focus on
cancer vaccines and vaccines against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). A
vaccine against a colorectal cancer was produced in tobacco plants [13], as was
a vaccine for treating non-Hodgkins lymphoma [14]. A vaccine against the
papilloma virus oncogene product causing human cervical cancer was produced
using a potato virus-X vector carrying an antigen of the viral oncogene-encoded
protein [15]. These cancer vaccines are an important effort to control cancer,
but careless environmental release of the vaccines in crop plants could greatly
increase peoples susceptibility to specific cancers through the
development of oral tolerance.
The Gag gene from Simian Immunodeficiency virus (SIV) a surrogate
for HIV, was used to transform potato [16]. In that experiment, the native SIV
gene was used rather than a plant enhanced synthetic copy. Failure to alter the
genetic code to the form most active in plants may explain the relatively low
production of Gag protein. In another experiment, the coat protein of alfalfa
mosaic virus was modified to express antigenic peptides for rabies virus and
HIV. Antibodies against rabies and HIV were expressed in mice immunized with
the antigenic peptides [17]. Simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)
tat gene was fused to the cholera toxin subunit gene and the combination
was used to transform potato and the fusion protein was found suitable for
mucosal immunization [18]. In none of the above publications was the
potential danger of the horizontal spread and recombination of the virus genes
discussed.
A number of technical enhancements have been attempted to enhance the
vaccine antigen production in plants. Codon usage enhancement has been
mentioned [3]. Various combinations of promoters and enhancers were used to
boost expression of a gene from rabbit hemorrhagic virus in potato [19]. The
potato patatin promoter proved more effective than the CaMV or the ubiquitin
promoter. Ricin B, a lectin sub-unit of the deadly poison ricin, has been
proposed as a delivery adjuvant for mucosal vaccines [20]. At least as far as
the published information is concerned, plant-based vaccines and antibodies are
far from ready for major commercial production. Production of plant-based
vaccines in primary food crops such as maize and rice is extremely unwise on
environmental and health grounds, but a recent publication indicates that
maize, at least, is still promoted by crop plant vaccine promoters [21].
Regulators must put the brakes on firmly now
In conclusion, there has been extensive creation and field tests of
plant-based vaccines and therapeutic antibodies, with little care given to the
environmental and health consequences of the field releases. The major
accidental exposures of the public that have come to light have done little to
dampen the accelerating pace of development and testing, most of which are
taking place in secret away from public scrutiny.
We are heading towards a monumental poisoning of our primary food
supply, unless the regulators put the brakes on firmly now.
| |
|