*Milo Wolff’s Universe of coherent quantum matter waves claims
to overcome difficulties and paradoxes in conventional quantum theory and
general relativity with applications in electronics and cosmology - Dr Mae-Wan Ho*

Milo Wolff (now retired) is an American mathematical physicist and computer software expert with an extremely varied career [1]. His work included professorships in the Far East, at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and on the Apollo moon craft navigation system. But his main claim to fame is the theory of the wave structure of matter, in which the electron is represented as consisting of two spherical quantum waves, one moving radially outward and another moving radially inward, resulting in standing waves at the centre of where the electron ‘particle’ is nominally located. These quantum waves extend throughout the universe; all waves mixing and contributing to one another. This simple representation is able to overcome major difficulties and paradoxes in conventional quantum theory and general relativity [2, 3].

Austrian physicist and philosopher Ernst Mach (1838-1916) proposed in 1883 that the law of inertia depended on all the matter of the universe [4]: “Every local inertial frame is determined by the composite matter of the universe...... [W]hen the subway jerks, it is the fixed stars that throw you down.” This became known as Mach’s principle.

Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity was greatly influenced by Mach’s principle [5, 6], although it could not be included in the theory. The reason lies within the foundations of classical physics itself.

The foundations of classical physics
follow from the equations of Scottish mathematical physicist James Clerk
Maxwell (1831-1879),
which represents
matter as *point *charges and electromagnetic waves. English theoretical
physicist Paul Dirac (1902-1984) never accepted point particles
because Coulomb’s force law had to be corrected by ‘renormalization’ [7]: “This
is just not sensible mathematics. Sensible mathematics involves neglecting a
quantity because it turns out to be small, not neglecting it because it is
infinitely large and you do not want it!” Austrian quantum physicist Erwin
Schrödinger (1887-1961), likewise, proposed to
eliminate point particles by using a quantum wave structure [8]: “What we
observe as material bodies and forces are nothing but shapes and variations in
the structure of space.”

In 1928, Dirac was looking for a connection
between the conservation of energy given by *E*^{2} = *p*^{2}*c*^{2}
+ *m*_{0}^{2}*c*^{4} and Schrödinger’s
quantum theory. He wrote [9]: “The new quantum mechanics, when applied to the
problem of the structure of the atom with point-charge electrons, does not give
results in agreement with experiment.” He used the concept of spin previously
introduced by others including Austrian-born theoretical physicist Wolfgang
Pauli (1900-1958), ending up with the Dirac equation that produces the right
experimental results, but the magnitude of the spin (orbital angular momentum)
is not a constant [9, 10].

American theoretical physicists John Archibald Wheeler (1911-2008) and Richard Feynman (1918-1988) tried to tackle the same problem by modelling the electron in 1945 [11] as spherical inward and outward electromagnetic waves in order to explain radiation forces, but failed because there are no spherical solutions of vector electromagnetic wave equations.

Milo
Wolff’s wave atructure of matter [2, 3] replaces point particles and
electromagnetic waves with spherical in-and-out *scalar *quantum waves (as
opposed to Wheeler and Feynman’s vector electromagnetic waves). This
quantum-wave structure for the electron possesses all the electron’s
experimental properties and eliminates the paradoxes of quantum mechanics and
cosmology. The non-existence of the material particle electron also removes the
probabilistic interpretation of the wave functions, i.e., “God does not play
dice” as Einstein said.

There are only two spherical wave solutions.

Outward wave *Ø*_{out} = (1/*r*)
*Ø _{o} e^{i}^{w}^{t}*

Inward wave *Ø*_{in } = (1/*r*)
*Ø _{o} e^{i}^{w}^{t}*

Where
*Ø* is a
scalar wave amplitude, *w* is the frequency 2*pmc*^{2}/*h*,
*k *is the wave number, *r* is the radius from the wave centre. These
two waves can be combined in only two forms that become the structures of the
electron-positron.

Electron *Ø*_{in} - *Ø*_{out} + CW
spin (2a)

Positron *Ø*_{out} - *Ø*_{in} + CCW
spin (2b)

CW
(clockwise) and CCW (counter-clockwise) are rotation (spin) operators of the
waves at the centre. Each wave pair contains an inward wave that rotates *twice*
at the centre converting it to an outward wave (Figure 1) [3]. The reason is
that the spherical waves must continually and smoothly change amplitude while
changing direction of motion without twisting up space, and there is only one
way to do this with either CW or CCW rotation.

It has been shown [12] that in
spherical rotation, space returns to its initial state after two turns, and any
exponential oscillator *e ^{i}^{w}^{t}* is a
spinor. In spherical rotation, there is no fixed axis. Spherical symmetry is
preserved because the centre of rotation is a point. It is significant that
only 3-dimensional space has this unique property. Wolff realized that the
exponential in-out waves were the real physical spinors satisfying the Dirac
equation. The rotation and reversal of the inward wave amplitude at the centre
can be represented by Dirac’s spinor algebra. One direction of rotation
produces the electron, the other, the positron. That is why every charged
particle has an anti-particle. Rotating an in-wave two turns each cycle produces
an angular momentum of

*Figure 1 The
spherical waves of the electron and positron*

The spherical out-waves of an initial electron encounter other electron waves. At each encounter, a signature of the initial electron is transferred to the out-waves of other electrons. The waves generated become a Huygens combination (a single wave-front) for the in-wave of the initial electron. This intermingled exchange of waves makes each particle like a 3-dimensional hologram of all others in the universe [2] (Figure 2).

*Figure 2
Formation of the quantum in-wave*

Energy
transfer lacks a mechanism in the classical framework. Wolff [13] extended
Mach’s principle to calculate the density of the wave medium as the summation
of waves from each particle (10^{80}) in our universe, each diminished
by the inverse square law of distance. From the density of the medium, the
amplitude of waves and motion of each particle can be calculated because wave
velocity *c *is determined by the density of space. The energy transfer
carried out by the quantum waves of the electron at speed *c *is seen by
us as light waves.

Mach’s
principle had been criticized because it appeared to require instantaneous
action-at-a-distance. The answer is that the energy exchange due to quantum
matter waves is going on *all the time* in empty space. That is the basis
of instantaneous action-at-a-distance. Inertia is an interaction between an
accelerated object and its surrounding space. The matter of the universe
combines to tell the space medium what it is and in turn the medium tells all matter
how to behave; this is essentially the same feedback loop implied in Einstein’s
general relativity.

Wolff
[13] also derived a relationship between the effective radius *r* of the
electron, the radius *R* of the Hubble (expanding) universe, and the number
of particles *N* in the universe, termed the Equation of the Cosmos.

*r*^{2}
= *R*^{2}/(3*N*) (3)

The
value of *r* corresponds to the classical electron radius ~10^{-15}
m. The waves of an electron have a finite maximum wave density at the centre,
thus removing the need for renormalization that troubled Dirac, Feynman, and
others.

Wolff provides a summary of the natural laws that can be derived from the structure of electron in Eq (2a, 2b) [3], some of which have been mentioned.

- The
Doppler effect between two wave structures moving relative to each other,
the observer and the source, can be derived using Doppler mathematics.
They are calculated by writing two waves like Eq (2a, 2b) for two
relatively moving electrons. The Doppler effect is inserted into both the
inward and outward waves. Then one finds that each term of the resulting
total Doppler shifted wave containing mass or frequency has a relativistic
mass-increase factor (this will have application in the new cosmology).
The Doppler wavelength becomes the deBroglie
*l*=*h*/*p*, and the phase velocity contains the Compton wavelength*l*=*h*/*mc*. There is no dependence on the direction of the relative velocity, as is experimentally observed, and there was no theoretical explanation before Wolff’s wave structure of matter. As both the in- and out-waves have symmetrical roles in the Doppler effect there can be no directional dependence. - Electron and positron waves annihilate when superposed.
- Spin
of
*h*/4*p*due to rotation twice at the centre of the in-wave to become the out-wave. - The conservation of energy because only identical wave states can resonate with each other, producing equal and opposite frequency (energy) shifts.
- Electric force interactions appear to occur (as proposed by Schrödinger) at the high-density centres and the wave centres appear like point charges.
- Gravity appears as follows. The in-wave arriving at the centre establishes the position and motion of a particle. Matter nearby modifies the density of the surrounding medium. The changed medium density changes in-wave motion, moving the particle towards the matter, thus causing gravity and other forces.
- The charge, parity, and time transformation invariance of an electron, known in quantum mechanics for many years, is contained in Eq (2a, 2b).
- Inertia
arises due to the acceleration of matter which changes its Doppler frequency
relative to the wave medium. Restoring frequency equilibrium produces
energy exchanges with the medium that appears as local force
*F*=*ma*. The total energy exchange will follow the relativistic rule from (a) above, which at small velocity becomes the familiar kinetic energy*E*= ½*m*v^{2}.

The
electromagnetic consequence of Wolff’s wave structure of matter was
investigated by Carver Mead, an engineer at California Institute of Technology
in his prize-winning book, *Collective Electrodynamics* [14]. The book has
become very popular in silicon-valley because it shows the correct ways to
solve the electromagnetics of transistor circuits, replacing Maxwell’s
equations. It is very likely to have many further applications in micro-chip
design and micro-electronics.

Another area where the Machian nature of Wolff’s theory and relativistic mass finds important application is cosmology, especially in the intrinsic redshift of quasars [15] (Halton Arp’s Theory of Quasars Re-visited, and other articles in the series).

*Article first published 03/03/16*

- Biography of mathematical physicist Dr Milo Wolff. On Truth and Reality, accessed 27 February 2016, http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Wolff-Biography.htm
- Wolff M. Spin, the origin of the natural laws, and the binary universe. California Section of the American Physical Society, 30 March 2001, University of California, Irvine, California.
- Wolff M. and Haselhurst G. Light and the Electron – Einstein’s last question. Presentation at meeting “Beyond Einstein”, Stanford University, 2004.
- Mach E. The Science of Mechanics, Open Court, London, 1960.
- Einstein
A.
*The Meaning of Relativity*, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955. - Lichtenegger H and Mashhoon B. Mach’s Principle. arXiv:physics/0407078v2 [physics.hist-ph] 31 Mar 2008
- Dirac P.
Quantum electrodynamics.
*Nature*1937, 174, 321. - Schrödinger E. In Schrödinger – Life and Thought, Cambridge University Press, p. 327, 1989.
- Dirac
PAM. The quantum theory of the electron.
*Proc Roy Soc A*1928, 117, 610-23. - Dirac
PAM. The quantum theory of the electron. Part II.
*Proc Roy Soc A*1928, 118, 351-61. - Wheeler
JA and Feynman R. Interaction with the absorber as the mechanism of radiation.
*Rev Mod Phy*1945, 17, 157-181. - Battey-Pratt E and Racey T. Geometric model of fundamental particles. Int J Theor Phys 1980, 19, 437-75.
- Wolff M.
Fundamental laws, microphysics and cosmology.
*Physics Essays*1993, 6, 181-203. - Mead C.
*Collective Electrodynamics*, MIT Press, Mass, 2002. - Ho MW. Halton Arp’s theory of quasars re-visited..

Got something to say about this page? Comment

There are 7 comments on this article so far. Add your comment above.

**Tam Hunt** Comment left 4th March 2016 06:06:17

Very interesting recent pieces on cosmology and physics, Dr. Ho. I hope there is a book coming out soon collecting your ideas into a coherent alternative picture of the universe.

**Thomas Simon** Comment left 4th March 2016 18:06:01

Dear Dr. Ho,
thank you for the very interesting piece. I have learned a lot from you about physics and the universe via ISIS during the past 10 years. I wish you fast and full recovery from your illness and hope that you will return to run ISIS and keep educating us.
All the best to you: Thomas

**Dr Barry T Rubin** Comment left 5th March 2016 00:12:52

Dear Dr Mae Wan Ho
This is a very interesting article and looks to have many ramifications in other fields of science.
I wonder whether the recent discovery of the exisitence of gravity waves can impact this treatment - gravity wave interactions with Wolff's theory of relativistic mass.
You are treasure for all you do - in science, art and humanity. I hope that you will recover from your illness as soon as possible with renewed strength and dedication.
Barry

**Franz-Xaver Hipp** Comment left 5th March 2016 21:09:49

Dear Dr. Mae Wan Ho. Thank you very much for this interesting article. Your articles over the past years have been always very interesting und helpful for a coherent alternative picture of the universe and the human being. I am very sad about your illness and I hope you will recover as soon as possible. All the best to you. Xaver

**Marie-Paule Nougaret** Comment left 16th April 2016 01:01:11

Dear Mae Wan, thank you for all the openings in our mind. Wish you the best
mpn

**Todd Millions** Comment left 10th April 2016 11:11:37

"-Place your hand in moving water.Feel the last of what was,and the first of what will be."-Leonardo Da Vinci. A whole technical approach of using tones to send and coordinate signal(not just Baudex telex) was used on the trans Canada microwave beam system in the 1950's to 1980's. Beat signals in this were used to diagnose and signal problems in the system as well.Not quite digital nor analog as these systems were defined.A different approach.
If this model had being developed into other areas-
Would this spin model have come into prominence more fully?earlier perhaps? Our tools can define us more than we think about.Our thought tools and mapping particularly so. If is such a large word. I will miss this site and its oft astounding content and commentators greatly. I wish I could have supported it better as was earned and deserved. Dr Mae-Wan Ho you are appreciated ,Honoured and Loved. I thank you and yours.Godspeed

**Ted** Comment left 22nd September 2016 23:11:37

Hi
Looks like we need a new scientific cosmological model to challenge the Big Bang theory.
Another website presents such a new model on what the universe is and compliments much of what is covered on this great website on the subject. The proposed model considers that the universe is an Electromagnetic Standing wave that propagates harmonically related standing waves. It is also proposed that this is all there is!